Advocate's Diary is a project aimed at addressing the dearth of literature on court practice and litigation advocacy.
Advocate's Diary is a project aimed at addressing the dearth of literature on court practice and litigation advocacy. To this end, we aim to create a repository of columns on the essentials of court practice – ranging from civil suits to criminal trials, from ADR procedures to enforcement of decrees and judgments, and more.
The guest columns in the series aim to develop a conversation channel with seasoned practitioners, senior advocates, arbitrators and judges.
Our previous columns in the Advocate’s Diary series have covered the stage of a civil suit which leads to the topic on focus in the present one – the filing of substantive pleadings, which contains the details of the case that has brought the parties to the doors of a civil court.
In this column, we aim to encapsulate the essentials of pleadings in a civil suit – with a specific focus on plaints and written statements, and landmark decisions of the Supreme Court and High Courts discussing their relevance.
Given the limited scope of a civil court to adjudicate the dispute that the parties present to it, the importance of comprehensive and detailed pleadings becomes all the more accentuated to ensure that the aggrieved party is able to secure the relief it wants from its suit.
In this column, we first lay down the law on pleadings simpliciter and the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code 1908 (CPC) governing pleadings; second, we specifically focus on the intricacies of a plaint and a written statement; and third, we look at the changes brought to pleadings by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Broad overview
A pleading is defined under Order VI Rule 1 of the CPC as a plaint or written statement. The object of any pleading is to ensure that the relief sought by a plaintiff are clearly spelt out, and are supported by appropriate factual averments. Each pleading must be tailored to provide the other side with the intimation of what your pleaded case is, so that they can respond to such claims and relief sought specifically. Moreover, a pleading is the opportunity for the Court to fully understand what the core issues are between the parties which need to be adjudicated. This was succinctly summarized in Bachhaj Nahar v. Nilima Mandal, where the Supreme Court observed that:
“The object and purpose of pleadings and issues is to ensure that the litigants come to trial with all issues clearly defined and to prevent cases being expanded or grounds being shifted during trial.”
In Bacchaj Nihar, and a number of subsequent decisions, the Supreme Court laid down the golden rule of pleadings – that in the absence of a specific prayer and pleadings in support of the prayed for relief, a civil court will be remiss to grant such relief to the plaintiff, since it will lead to a miscarriage of justice for the defendant. The rationale behind such an interpretation on the specificity of pleadings is the importance of giving the defendant a fair and equal chance of refuting the plaintiff’s case. If the plaintiff fails to disclose a crucial fact, or claim a certain relief without having any supporting pleadings in its plaint, the defendant would be deprived of that opportunity.
However, the court is also rooted in the reality of the prevailing social circumstances in which many parties are compelled to file civil suits seeking relief. It is this empathy which led to courts adopting a more liberal approach in assessing procedural compliance of a pleading, and give way to the rule of liberal construction. The rule of liberal construction essentially states that pleadings should be construed liberally, as long as the court can ensure that no prejudice is caused to the other side as a result of such interpretation.
This view was further elaborated in Kedar Lal v. Hari Lal, where the Supreme Court held that a civil court should be slow to throw out a claim on a mere technicality of pleading when it contains the relevant substantive averments, and where allowing such a pleading will not cause any prejudice to the other side. It also clarified that it was always open to a court to give a plaintiff such general or other relief as it deemed fit, which would be to a limited extent, provided that it did not cause any prejudice to the other side beyond what can be compensated for in costs.
Essentials of pleadings
A pleading should (a) state material facts and not the evidence on which the party seeks to rely on, (b) state such facts in a concise form, and (c) provide all particulars where they are required.
These conditions are contained in Order VI Rule 2 of the CPC, and the requirement to state all material facts has time and again been emphasized by the Supreme Court. For instance, in Udhav Singh v Madhav Rao Scindia, it was clarified that all the primary facts which must be proved at the trial by a party to establish the existence of a cause of action or his defence, are material facts. Courts have also made it clear on previous occasions that a pleading does not need to contain legal arguments or contentions – but only contain the relevant and material factual averments which give rise to a legal right in favour of the plaintiff, or create a legal duty on the defendant which is alleged to have been breached.
The duty to disclose all material facts during pleadings is crucial though, since a court will not allow a party to lead evidence on a particular fact if it has failed to include it in its pleading. Furthermore, the failure to disclose material facts can even attract the grave consequence of the suit being dismissed in its entirety, making the observations of the Supreme Court in Virender Nath v. Satpal Singh pivotal:
“. it is however absolutely essential that all basic and primary facts which must be proved at the trial by the party to establish existence of a cause of action or defence are material facts and must be stated in the pleadings by the party.”
It is also a general rule that the pleadings should contain only facts which are required to be proved (facta probanda) and not the facts by means of which they are to be proved (facta probantia). In other words, pleadings should contain a statement of material facts on which the party relies upon, but not the evidence by which those facts are to be proved. [Borrodaile v Hunter]
Order VI Rule 6 of the CPC further requires a party to provide any condition precedent which is needed to be fulfilled before a particular relief can be sought before, and ultimately granted by the civil court. Rule 9 also requires that the description and effect of the documents which the party seeks to rely upon needs to be stated in the pleading (which later aids the party as well as the court during the marking of such documents into evidence). The requirement for the pleadings to be in a concise form are further developed by the conditions laid down in Order VI Rule 2, which states that each allegation must be contained in a separate paragraph, ensuring that the pleading is easily readable and understandable.
Any pleading that is to be filed in court is required to be signed by both the party and the pleader on behalf of the party, as per Rules 14 and 15 of Order VI. A pleading will also require an affidavit in support of the averments made and the documents submitted, which is filed in the name of the contesting party. This affidavit is replaced by a Statement of Truth under the Commercial Courts Act – which also requires a verification to be submitted along with any pleading under the amended Order VI Rule 15A.
However, each civil court also has specific procedural directions and rules which are to be complied with for any pleading to be filed in such court. For original civil suits at the Delhi High Court, the appropriate rules to be followed are contained in the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules 2018. For civil courts in Karnataka, the Karnataka Rules of Civil Practice 1967 contains the appropriate regulations and guidelines for the filing of pleadings, applications etc.
